Thunar 1.0.2

Continuing from the previous post:
http://bkhome.org/blog/?viewDetailed=02224

I have recompiled Thunar to run properly in Wary. The PET (420KB):
http://distro.ibiblio.org/quirky/pet_packages-wary5/thunar-1.0.2-1-w5.pet

This is how I compiled it:
libxfce4util 4.8.1

# ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --build=i486-pc-linux-gnu --disable-shared --enable-static --disable-debug

exo 0.3.107
# ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --build=i486-pc-linux-gnu --disable-shared --enable-static --disable-python --disable-hal --enable-debug=no

libxfce4ui 4.8.0
# ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --build=i486-pc-linux-gnu --disable-shared --enable-static --disable-keyboard-library --disable-gladeui --disable-debug

thunar 1.0.2
edited thunar/thunar-window.c to remove running-as-root message.
# ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --build=i486-pc-linux-gnu --disable-dbus --enable-debug=minimum --disable-sbr-plugin --enable-pcre --disable-tpa-plugin --disable-uca-plugin --disable-wallpaper-plugin --disable-apr-plugin --enable-gnome-thumbnailers --with-volume-manager=none --enable-static --disable-shared


Note that I also compiled the latest Thunar, version 1.3.0, however it has a bug -- when I open a second window, the thumbnails do not display.


Posted on 20 Apr 2011, 12:01


Comments:

Posted on 20 Apr 2011, 12:20 by BarryK
Thunar versus ROX-Filer
After using Thunar for awhile, I was very pleased to get back to ROX.

Many reasons. I also played with Thunar 1.3.0, same shortcomings compared with ROX.

I think that the people who complain that they want a two-pane file manager are just saying that out of habit. You might disagree with me, but I don't think it has any usability advantages compared with ROX.

There were little things that I missed, such as the little bubble on a file-icon to show that it is a symlink, and mouse-over to see where the link points to. Drag and drop, and be asked whether want to copy or move the file(s).

I have always thought that the ROX developer really understood practical usability, that some other file manager developers lack. I remember some years ago playing with the Nautilus file manager, and coming to the same conclusion.

Another point is that running Thunar standalone without Xfce carries a lot of dead weight. The size is larger than ROX, yet has far less features.

Anyway, for those who want it, it is now a PET.



Posted on 20 Apr 2011, 14:46 by disciple
rox
There are situations where a tree view is very handy. But I'd choose Rox over anything else.

Konqueror is pretty good too, but I wouldn't want all that KDE bloat ;)


Posted on 20 Apr 2011, 17:53 by BarryK
Re ROX
Well, of course I mean a little arrow on the icon to indicate a symlink, a bubble for a mount point.

Yeah, others might see it differently from me, so take my post as personal viewpoint only.

I have never seen the treeview as all that useful. I used Windows Explorer for years and was glad to leave it behind.
With ROX I jump up and down levels, and often have multiple windows open, and it works fine for me.



Posted on 21 Apr 2011, 2:47 by joec.
I agree
I agree with you Barry, It did take a while to learn
but it works just fine for me.
joe c


Posted on 21 Apr 2011, 3:17 by playdayz
libjpeg.so.62
Barry, Lucid 5.2.5 contains both libjpeg.so.62 and libjpeg.so.7. For reasons I forget, this worked better than a symlink.

The original pet you posted seems to be running OK in Lucid. I added it to the Lucid PPM repo. I will test the newer pet.

Thanks.



Posted on 21 Apr 2011, 5:57 by wombat01
Rox
Rox is great. It might not have two windows but it's easy to open a second rox and drag and drop betwen them.


Posted on 21 Apr 2011, 7:19 by ozsouth
Rox etc
I didn't mean to start a bunfight folks. As always, I respect Barry (and others) decisions in these matters. I help people in their 80s use Puppy, & simple things like mouse operations & multiple windows are challenging. Emelfm allows 'click then enter' for example, & they can see files 'jump' from one pane to another. I use tightvnc sometimes, but it saps their confidence if I do it too often. They also have trouble remembering stuff, so I'm always looking for simple options. They love Puppy.


Posted on 16 May 2011, 22:02 by DaveS
2 bugs
Using Thunar for a while but there are two killer bugs
Selecting a .jpg file causes a crash, and symlinks use the same icon as directories making them impossible to tell apart.