Pnethood versus lameSMBxplorer

For those who say that Pnethood works for them, lameSMBxplorer doesn't, or vice-versa, I have put both into Quirky/Wary.

The Pnethood package by HairyWill is 'pnethood-0.65-utf8-3.pet' and has a bugfix provided by shinobar awhile back. Forum thread:
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=23464

Oh yeah, here is shinobar's patch that I applied:
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=50319&start=30

lameSMBxplorer by Patriot:
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=50901

...note that I have not included the "addon" package 'lameSMBqmount'.

After playing with both, maybe the Samba-user guys can decide which one is best, or at least which should be developed into the future.

---

Comments

samba pie binaries
Username: technosaurus
I recompiled Samba not too long ago and noticed issues similar to git (compiling several binaries against included static libraries) except Samba is much worse - it defaults to a position independent executable which makes it even larger. Since we are only using a select few of the binaries, my hack to use shared libraries didn't make a big difference overall, but compiling non-PIE with -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -Wl,--gc-sections nearly cut the size in half without any other modifications. I posted the binaries at the lameSMB thread http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=50901"28 Apr 2010, 24:04"01544"138.162.8.57'

Tags: woof