No comments Quirky "April series" 7.0.4 is released. This is another bug-fix release, with incremental improvements since 7.0.
The full announcement and release notes for 7.0 are here:
Quirky 7.0.3 was released on April 9, see blog announcement:
Download 7.0.4 from here:
Faster mirror site:
Release notes for 7.0.4, relative to 7.0.3:
1. 'ghostview' script to display .ps files.
2. New 'gsl' package.
3. Hardinfo (hardware information) version upgrade.
4. Quirky Installer improved (see /usr/local/install_quirky).
5. Package Manager improvements.
6. 'popup' utility has new features.
7. QuickSetup now has instant language translation.
8. Bugfix for Isomaster (ISO editor).
One interesting thing you will notice at first bootup when QuickSetup runs (also can be run from the Setup menu). Language flags, that offer immediate translation of the QuickSetup, and 'welcome1stboot', windows.
Appropriate quicksetup.mo and welcome1stboot.mo files are now built-in to Quirky -- so if you want this new feature for your language, use MoManager to create them (see Utility menu) and send to me.
The script /usr/sbin/quicksetup also has translations for some things, such as tooltips, built-in to the script. Some of which I used Google-translate to create, so you are welcome to revise the translations.
Planned for future
I was intending to add UEFI booting for the live-CD, however that is deferred, probably to 7.0.5.
Feedback is welcome here:
1 Comment German
Forum member L18L has sent me a new German (de) langpack. I have uploaded it here (4.2MB):
Notes for L18L:
I fixed /root/spot. Directory and subdirectories need to have ownership spot:spot.
Why are there .pot files in /usr/sbin? That is the wrong place for them.
I downloaded the latest Italian (it) langpack, created by forum member xanad, see here:
However, I cannot use it. The problem is, it contains binary executables. I noticed 'gmeasures' for example, that is internationalised in Quirky 7.0.3.
If a binary executable is not yet internationalised in Quirky, then it should be left out of the langpack.
I intended for langpacks to reside in a "noarch" repository, and to work with any CPU.
Note, I also intended that one langpack can work for all variants of Puppy/Quirky -- this is doable, but does need a bit more development of MoManager to make it easier.
So, I am staying with the older Italian langpack created by vicmz, see here:
No comments I bought two cheap smartphones from China. I have both of them in front of me, and will do a mini comparison. For now, focussing on the Mlais M52, what are my first impressions?
I reported on ordering the M52 here:
OK, so it has a very fast octa-core 64-bit CPU, does 3G and 4G (with all the frequencies that I need in Australia), 5.5 inch screen, removable battery, and most importantly for me, dual-sim slots plus a sd-card slot.
There are a couple of negative comments that I have to get out of the way. Firstly, Mlais have advertised the cameras as 13 megapixel at back, 8 at front. However, it has been reported that they are only 8 and 5.
Another thing is the battery -- this is advertised as 3200mah. However, based upon its weight (47g) and volume, I would say it is about 2600mah.
Other reviewers have commented on poor camera performance and likely over-stated battery capacity. OK, battery capacities are overstated by every manufacturer anyway, but Mlais are taking lying to a new level.
Most unfortunate, the company is lying, to make the product look better than it is. If I had known this beforehand, I would not have purchased an Mlais, as a matter of principle.
But, I do have one, so what do I think of the phone? Actually, it is a very nice phone, very well made.
This is what I wanted. Here in Australia, I get the best deal with two sims, one for phone calls and texting, the other for data. I already reported on a data sim with 12GB per month, AU$40 (US$29), no excess fees, from Virgin Mobile:
You just cannot get that much data from a phone/text/data plan, unless you pay a lot lot more.
For phone/text, there are excellent cheap pay-as-you-go prepaid plans. I looked for one with long expiry. I settled on Amaysim "as you go" prepaid plan. I have this thing, reluctant to give out my credit card details over the Internet -- well, Amaysim have retail outlets all over the place, and I just paid cash, $2 for a sim, $10 credit, and I am good for 90 days. Calls are 12c per minute, texts 12c each.
Note, I don't talk for long on the phone, so the pay-per-minute is ok for me. If you are a chatterbox, Optus have a prepaid pay-as-you-go sim that has 180 day expiry, $1 fee per-day for a calls or text, and if the calls go over 30 minutes it becomes $1.50 for unlimited calls. if you don't make any calls/texts in the day, no charge.
I use the data-sim as my only Internet access, both on-the-go and at home. At home, I turn on tethering, also known as wi-fi hot-spot, and access the Internet from my laptop.
It works well, I have not encountered any problem with the two sims, no clashes.
This is weird. The other phone I purchased is a Elephone P6000, with 5 inch screen. A smaller phone, lighter than the Mlais, yet in my hand it feels heavier.
The Malis M52 weighs 172g (with battery), the Elephone weighs 167g. Without batteries, they are 125g and 117g.
Weird, the feeling of the Elephone is that it is heavier. It is slightly thicker, but only about 1mm. Smaller dimensions. Not only does the Mlais feel lighter, it feels better in my hand, despite being bigger -- maybe because it is slightly thinner and the back slightly more curved.
They are both 720p screens, and I have to say, this is enough. The 1440p screens on premium phones these days is just ridiculous. I am hard-pressed to see any pixelation on these screens, 720p looks good. OK, I might be persuaded to go up to 1080p to banish pixelation totally if squinting up close to the screen, but beyond that is just an unnecessary drain on the battery, as well as dragging down performance.
The slightly bigger screen is nicer, so the Mlais wins there. Also, the screen is brighter and has higher contrast than the Elephone -- seeing them side-by-side, the difference is quite striking. Playing with brightness levels does not help, the Elephone is inferior.
With the Mlais, whites are whiter, blacks are blacker, colours are richer.
Both phones have wider bezels than I expect of a modern phone. The Mlais excessively so. We already have a bigger screen, and the wide bezels make for a much bigger phone than I would like. However, as already stated, the thinness, 8.9mm and curved back make it a nice fit in my hand.
They both have pretty much stock Android, the Mlais has 4.4.4, the Elephone has 5.0 (Lollipop). Both have external capacitive buttons on the "chin", which I very much prefer, however, I am not accustomed to the change in functionality of those buttons with Lollipop.
Mlais have released Lollipop, which I may upgrade to sometime. However online reports are don't do it, as it is buggy. So, I will wait. Android 4.4.4 on the Mlais is a 32-bit operating system, so an upgrade to Lolliop will bring true 64-bit performance -- yet, the current OS is very fast.
Elephone seem to be taking the lead here, with a Windows utility for flashing various flavours of Android onto their phones. This ease of flashing is something that I am interested in.
I will report some more, but for now, I can draw some conclusions. Neither of these phones is ideal for me, but I have to remember that they are cheap.
The slightly smaller phone is easier to carry in a pants pocket, though weights are similar. But, it is the screen that decides it for me. The brighter and higher-contrast screen of the Mlais is so much nicer to look at.
So, despite my misgivings about their false advertising, I like the Mlais and for now this is the phone that I am carrying around. For now, anyway. If another phone comes along with same specs but smaller bezels and hopefully lighter weight, oh and a better camera, I will be tempted.
I should add a little post-note. I based my decision to buy the Mlais on a glowing review at gizchina.com. Although the reviewer did not expose the false claim of 13mp, the reviewer did identify that camera performance is poor. The reviewer also raised doubt about the battery capacity. See their review:
2Comments Forum member L18L is one of our translation experts, and has made many great contributions, such as improving MoManager (translation GUI, see Utility menu) and creation and maintaining of the German (de) language pack.
L18L has create a PET for opening any application in a specific language:
I have taken the script 'launch_app_in_another_LANGUAGE' out of it and put it into woofQ, in usr/sbin. Also the two images that the script needs.
Also put usr/share/i18n/lang_names into woofQ.
But left out the locale files that are in the PET.
There is some more stuff to do, see L18L's interesting posts here:
1 Comment I have compiled Inkscape 0.91 for the amd64 (x86_64) build of Quirky April. No extra dependencies required, this will work in April64 7.0.3, though the 'devx' PET package is recommended as it has python, needed for many of the Inkscape plugins.
Note, if you don't want to install the 'devx' PET, which is very big, it should be sufficient to install the 'python' package only -- which you can find in the "t2-april" repository in the Package Manager.
I intend to compile for the i686 April soon.
Note, compiling Inkscape required updating of gtkmm, which is required to compile only. This will be in the 'devx' PET of 7.0.4.
Ongoing discussion of all things Quirky is here:
Pages:      ...